14:31 05 Oct 24
Requests for Review / Reviews
According to paragraph 39 of the
JI guidelines
the "determination regarding reported reductions in anthropogenic emissions by sources or enhancements of anthropogenic removals by sinks shall be deemed final 15 days after the date on which it is made public, unless a Party involved in the project or three of the members of the Article 6 Supervisory Committee request a review by the Article 6 Supervisory Committee. If such a review is requested, the Article 6 Supervisory Committee shall:
(a) At its next meeting or no later than 30 days after the formal request for the review decide on its course of action. If it decides that the request has merit, it shall perform a review;
(b) Complete its review within 30 days following its decision to perform the review;
(c) Inform the project participants of the outcome of the review, and make public its decision and the reasons for it."
In this context, the JISC agreed on Procedures for reviews under the verification procedure under the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee (version 04) (221 KB).
As soon as three members of the JISC or one Party involved in the project request(s) a review the verification concerned is displayed in this section.
As soon as a final decision has been made in this context the verification is moved to the "archive" section.
* Information on requests for review/reviews is available by clicking on the relevant project/bundle.
** According to the Procedures for the withdrawal of submissions under the verification procedure under the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee (version 02) (128 KB).
(Unless otherwise indicated, the term "JI guidelines" refers to the annex of decision 9/CMP.1. In this annex the term "Article" refers to an Article of the Kyoto Protocol, unless otherwise specified.)
(a) At its next meeting or no later than 30 days after the formal request for the review decide on its course of action. If it decides that the request has merit, it shall perform a review;
(b) Complete its review within 30 days following its decision to perform the review;
(c) Inform the project participants of the outcome of the review, and make public its decision and the reasons for it."
In this context, the JISC agreed on Procedures for reviews under the verification procedure under the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee (version 04) (221 KB).
As soon as three members of the JISC or one Party involved in the project request(s) a review the verification concerned is displayed in this section.
As soon as a final decision has been made in this context the verification is moved to the "archive" section.
Requests for review/reviews* (sorted by monitoring period) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reference number | Title | Host Party(ies) | Sectoral scope(s) | Crediting period | Monitoring period | Monitoring report/verification number |
0137 | Joint Implementation project aimed at N2O emissions reduction by installation of secondary catalyst inside ammonia oxidation reactors at 3 nitric acid production plants NA2, NA3 and NA4 of Azomures SA company, situated at Târgu Mures, Romania | Romania | 5: Chemical industry | 24 Jul 08 - 31 Dec 12 | 05 Apr 11 - 13 Jul 12 | 003 (withdrawn)** |
* Information on requests for review/reviews is available by clicking on the relevant project/bundle.
** According to the Procedures for the withdrawal of submissions under the verification procedure under the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee (version 02) (128 KB).
(Unless otherwise indicated, the term "JI guidelines" refers to the annex of decision 9/CMP.1. In this annex the term "Article" refers to an Article of the Kyoto Protocol, unless otherwise specified.)
Connect with JI: